188bet

Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act: Definition, History, Impact

What Is the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act?

The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 is a law enacted by Congress to bolster worker protections against pay discrimination. The Act allows individuals facing pay discrimination to seek rectification under federal anti-discrimination laws.

The law clarifies that discrimination based on age, religion, national origin, race, sex, and disability will “accrue” every time the employee receives a paycheck that is deemed discriminatory. It was the first bill President Barack Obama signed into law and is one of a number of federal laws designed to protect the rights of workers.

Key Takeaways

  • The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act addresses wage discrimination on the basis of age, religion, national origin, race, sex, and disability.
  • The Act supplants a Supreme Court ruling that wage discrimination cases must be filed within 180 days of the start of the discrimination.
  • The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act effectively resets the clock by saying that wage discrimination cases can be filed within 180 days of the last paycheck in which the discrimination occurs.

Understanding the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act reinstated the protection against pay discrimination that had been removed by the Supreme Court in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. in 2007. It restored previous protections regarding the equal treatment of employees, most notably Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The 2009 statute clarified that any inequitable payment is unlawful, even if it is the result of a pay decision made in the past.

The act is named in honor of Lilly Ledbetter, a former manager at a Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant in Alabama. After Ledbetter discovered that her male peers were receiving substantially higher pay for similar roles, she filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

In 1998, Ledbetter filed an equal-pay lawsuit, alleging pay discrimination on the basis of sex under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The trial jury awarded her back pay and more than $3.3 million in compensatory and punitive damages.

However, the Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling that said claims like Ledbetter’s had to be filed within 180 days of an employer’s decision to pay a worker less, even if the worker didn’t learn about the unfair pay until much later. As a result, Ledbetter never collected any kind of settlement from Goodyear.

The act is named in honor of Lilly Ledbetter, who sued her employer, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., for paying her substantially less than her male peers. Ledbetter won the lawsuit but then saw the decision get overturned.

The ruling, and a dissenting opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in which she wrote, "once again, the ball is in Congress's court," ignited activist groups, who saw the court's decision as a setback for women and civil rights.

This led to the creation of a bill that bore Ledbetter's name and gives employees the right to file suit 180 days after the last pay violation and not only 180 days after the initial pay disparity. In effect, each paycheck restarts the 180-day countdown to file a claim.

If you believe you are being paid less than your co-workers because of your race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability, you can file a complaint with the EEOC. The complaint process is explained on the agency’s website.

Pay Discrimination in 2024

The Gender Wage Gap

One documented area of pay discrimination is the pay gap between men and women. In 2022, women’s annual earnings were 84% of men’s, according to data published by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Women of color are even more discriminated against. Black, Latina, and Native American women are paid 64%, 55%, and 59%, respectively, what non-Hispanic white men are paid.

Although the slogan “Equal Pay for Equal Work” dates back to the 1860s, Congress didn’t take major action to address the gender wage gap until the passage of the Equal Pay Act in 1963.

Salary History

Many experts believe that the practice of prospective employers asking job candidates about salary history furthers discrimination and the pay gap. In recent years, a growing number of states and municipalities have addressed this issue.

As of August 2023, 22 states have adopted measures that prohibit some employers from asking about salary history.

Prohibiting employers from asking about salary history seems to work. According to a study authored by economists at the Boston University School of Law, women's pay rises 8% to 9% under salary history bans, while the pay of Black workers increases 13% to 16%.

What Impact Did the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act Have?

The Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act allowed women and other people being discriminated against to dispute pay disparities from any period of their career. They could contest their current salary based on their starting salary from eight years ago on the basis that their starting salary was discriminatorily low. The impact is that it allows people to contest their salary for discriminatory reasons at any point in their career, instead of within a certain time period, as was the law before.

Did Lily Ledbetter Receive Backpay?

In her first trial against Goodyear, the judge ruled in her favor and awarded her backpay as well as the cost of compensatory and punitive damages. However, Goodyear appealed the case because she had not filed a complaint within 180 days, and won.

Was the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act Effective?

Policies like the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act can help narrow the gender pay gap. However, discrimination still exists, indicating that more action may be needed.

The Bottom Line

The Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is just one of the many advances made to prevent people from getting paid less because of their age, religion, national origin, race, sex, or a disability, but there is still a way to go. Discriminatory pay gaps still exist. The Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act serves as one of the protections that those who are discriminated against can rely on to help equalize their pay.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. The White House President Barack Obama. "."
  2. Congress.gov. "."
  3. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. "."
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. ""
  5. Cornell Law School. "."
  6. Cornell Law School. ""
  7. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. "."
  8. U.S. Census Bureau. "," Page 10.
  9. AAUW. “."
  10. National Women’s Law Center. "."
  11. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. "."
  12. HR Dive. "."
  13. Boston University. "."
  14. Obama White House. "."
Open a New Bank Account
×
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.
Sponsor
Name
Description
Open a New Bank Account
×
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.
m88 trực tuyến nhacaiuytin link 12bet 2888k casino fb88 nhà cái w88